Difference between revisions of "Lee2017b"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Clair-AntoineVeyrier moved page Lee2016b to Lee2017b without leaving a redirect: year issue)
(key issue)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|Title=Multimodal turn allocation in ESL peer group discussions
 
|Title=Multimodal turn allocation in ESL peer group discussions
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; ESL; Peer Interaction; Turn taking; Participation; In Press;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; ESL; Peer Interaction; Turn taking; Participation; In Press;
|Key=Lee2017
+
|Key=Lee2017b
 
|Year=2017
 
|Year=2017
 +
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Social Semiotics
 
|Journal=Social Semiotics
 
|Volume=27
 
|Volume=27

Revision as of 02:31, 11 July 2018

Lee2017b
BibType ARTICLE
Key Lee2017b
Author(s) Josephine Lee
Title Multimodal turn allocation in ESL peer group discussions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, ESL, Peer Interaction, Turn taking, Participation, In Press
Publisher
Year 2017
Language English
City
Month
Journal Social Semiotics
Volume 27
Number 5
Pages 671-692
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/10350330.2016.1207353
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article reports on multimodal practices used by English as a Second Language students as they work to distribute primary speakership within their peer group discussions. Following Goodwin’s participation framework, the focus is on the embodied conducts of the non-talking recipients and their nonvocal displays of emerging speakership in peer discussions. Analyses of the non-primary speakers’ gaze, gestures, touch, and bodily conduct show that the students’ turn allocation practices embody their sensitivity to the spatial and visual field of co-participants, project changing participation frameworks, and achieve incremental coordination of speaker nomination. Explorations of such nonvocal behaviors lead to a detailed understanding of the students’ embodied participation frameworks and the visible processes through which the students claim or avoid speakership during peer group discussions.

Notes