Kurhila-Kotilainen2020

From emcawiki
Revision as of 07:26, 29 March 2020 by ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Salla Kurhila; Lari Kotilainen |Title=Student-initiated language learning sequences in a real-world digital environment |Tag(s)=EMCA; Cl...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Kurhila-Kotilainen2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kurhila-Kotilainen2020
Author(s) Salla Kurhila, Lari Kotilainen
Title Student-initiated language learning sequences in a real-world digital environment
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Classroom interaction, Language learning, Second language learning, Cooking, Pedagogy
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Linguistics & Education
Volume 56
Number
Pages 100807
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100807
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Language learning that occurs outside the traditional classroom has become an important area of research. However, it is not self-evident how to combine the activities of the outside world with the pedagogical objectives and practices of (formal) language teaching. In this article, we approach this question by investigating data from a real-world digital language-learning environment, which merges language learning with cooking. Our research question concerns how participants initiate and construct language-learning sequences without being guided by a language teacher, and how they navigate between language learning and cooking activities. Using Conversation Analysis (CA), we demonstrate how learners transform their cooking environment into a language-learning session that is based on their own needs and interests. The key factors in the process include the material, semiotic and interactional resources offered by the cooking ecosystem, as well as the peer interaction as a means of knowledge-construction and interaction management. This analysis contributes to the current discussion on how different pedagogical contexts enhance student activity and self-regulation.

Notes