Difference between revisions of "Kazemi2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 +
|Volume=22
 +
|Number=5
 +
|Pages=553–570
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445620914674
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445620914674
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620914674
 
|DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620914674
 
|Abstract=This study examines the sequential and situated organization associated with framing locational formulations by dislocated parties to mobile phone calls for the joint accomplishment of location-related social action. The data come from 22 mundane Farsi mobile phone calls involving location inquiring and/or reporting. The analysis of the data, informed by conversational analysis and Levinson’s conceptual framework of perspective-taking, adds frame of reference (hereafter, FoR) to Schegloff’s location, membership, and topic or activity analyses operative in the selection of locational formulations. The trajectory plotted for location-related action indicates the contingent roles which material, linguistic and semiotic resources play in the selection of locational formulations deployed for co-presence purposes. The findings suggest consequentiality of the-relevant-next action for the framing of locational descriptions and provide insight into how conversationalists interact with their physical environment in a wider social context.
 
|Abstract=This study examines the sequential and situated organization associated with framing locational formulations by dislocated parties to mobile phone calls for the joint accomplishment of location-related social action. The data come from 22 mundane Farsi mobile phone calls involving location inquiring and/or reporting. The analysis of the data, informed by conversational analysis and Levinson’s conceptual framework of perspective-taking, adds frame of reference (hereafter, FoR) to Schegloff’s location, membership, and topic or activity analyses operative in the selection of locational formulations. The trajectory plotted for location-related action indicates the contingent roles which material, linguistic and semiotic resources play in the selection of locational formulations deployed for co-presence purposes. The findings suggest consequentiality of the-relevant-next action for the framing of locational descriptions and provide insight into how conversationalists interact with their physical environment in a wider social context.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:02, 1 August 2020

Kazemi2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kazemi2020
Author(s) Ali Kazemi
Title Fine-tuning locational formulations in mobile phone calls
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Farsi, locational formulations, mobile, place reference, anthropology
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 22
Number 5
Pages 553–570
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620914674
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study examines the sequential and situated organization associated with framing locational formulations by dislocated parties to mobile phone calls for the joint accomplishment of location-related social action. The data come from 22 mundane Farsi mobile phone calls involving location inquiring and/or reporting. The analysis of the data, informed by conversational analysis and Levinson’s conceptual framework of perspective-taking, adds frame of reference (hereafter, FoR) to Schegloff’s location, membership, and topic or activity analyses operative in the selection of locational formulations. The trajectory plotted for location-related action indicates the contingent roles which material, linguistic and semiotic resources play in the selection of locational formulations deployed for co-presence purposes. The findings suggest consequentiality of the-relevant-next action for the framing of locational descriptions and provide insight into how conversationalists interact with their physical environment in a wider social context.

Notes