Difference between revisions of "Houtkoop1997a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra; |Title=Being friendly in survey interviews |Tag(s)=EMCA; Survey Interviews; |Key=Houtkoop1997a |Year=1997...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra;  
+
|Author(s)=Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra;
 
|Title=Being friendly in survey interviews
 
|Title=Being friendly in survey interviews
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Survey Interviews;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Survey Interviews;
 
|Key=Houtkoop1997a
 
|Key=Houtkoop1997a
 
|Year=1997
 
|Year=1997
|Journal=Journal of Pramatics  
+
|Journal=Journal of Pramatics
 
|Volume=28
 
|Volume=28
|Pages=591-623
+
|Number=5
 +
|Pages=591–623
 +
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216697000180
 +
|DOI=10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00018-0
 +
|Abstract=This paper discusses the devices through which survey interviewers construct a ‘personal interview style’. The first part describes several types of interviewers' friendly reactions to respondents' assessable statements. The second part shows how interviewers may reformulate ‘neutrally’ scripted questions in such a way that they include a preference for a ‘socially desirable’ answer. In survey methodological terms, the interviewers transform neutral questions into leading questions. These are two turn sequential levels on which interviewers may be seen as ‘doing being personal’.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 10:10, 31 January 2016

Houtkoop1997a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Houtkoop1997a
Author(s) Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra
Title Being friendly in survey interviews
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Survey Interviews
Publisher
Year 1997
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pramatics
Volume 28
Number 5
Pages 591–623
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00018-0
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper discusses the devices through which survey interviewers construct a ‘personal interview style’. The first part describes several types of interviewers' friendly reactions to respondents' assessable statements. The second part shows how interviewers may reformulate ‘neutrally’ scripted questions in such a way that they include a preference for a ‘socially desirable’ answer. In survey methodological terms, the interviewers transform neutral questions into leading questions. These are two turn sequential levels on which interviewers may be seen as ‘doing being personal’.

Notes