Difference between revisions of "GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2019"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m (AndreiKorbut moved page GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2020 to GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2019 without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Esther González-Martínez; Jakub Mlynář | |Author(s)=Esther González-Martínez; Jakub Mlynář | ||
|Title=Practical trust | |Title=Practical trust | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Trust; Practical trust |
| − | |Key=GonzalezMartinez- | + | |Key=GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2019 |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2019 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Social Science Information | |Journal=Social Science Information | ||
| + | |Volume=58 | ||
| + | |Number=4 | ||
| + | |Pages=608–630 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0539018419890565 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0539018419890565 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/0539018419890565 |
|Abstract=We begin our article by placing various forms of trust distinguished by the literature along a continuum according to the truster’s practical orientation toward the possibility of things not going as expected. We then present the ethnomethodological respecification of trust as an observable phenomenon of order involving continuous practical work, in situ and in real time. Conversation analysis provides tools for capturing how trust is accomplished as interlocutors rely on ordinary orders of practice to organize talk-in-interaction. Built on these bases, the term ‘practical trust’ points to the strong link between trust, the organization of courses of action and the production of their accountability. In conclusion, we suggest undertaking empirical research to identify the practices that make trust a specific phenomenon of interactional order. | |Abstract=We begin our article by placing various forms of trust distinguished by the literature along a continuum according to the truster’s practical orientation toward the possibility of things not going as expected. We then present the ethnomethodological respecification of trust as an observable phenomenon of order involving continuous practical work, in situ and in real time. Conversation analysis provides tools for capturing how trust is accomplished as interlocutors rely on ordinary orders of practice to organize talk-in-interaction. Built on these bases, the term ‘practical trust’ points to the strong link between trust, the organization of courses of action and the production of their accountability. In conclusion, we suggest undertaking empirical research to identify the practices that make trust a specific phenomenon of interactional order. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:32, 19 January 2020
| GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | GonzalezMartinez-Mlynar2019 |
| Author(s) | Esther González-Martínez, Jakub Mlynář |
| Title | Practical trust |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Trust, Practical trust |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science Information |
| Volume | 58 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 608–630 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/0539018419890565 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We begin our article by placing various forms of trust distinguished by the literature along a continuum according to the truster’s practical orientation toward the possibility of things not going as expected. We then present the ethnomethodological respecification of trust as an observable phenomenon of order involving continuous practical work, in situ and in real time. Conversation analysis provides tools for capturing how trust is accomplished as interlocutors rely on ordinary orders of practice to organize talk-in-interaction. Built on these bases, the term ‘practical trust’ points to the strong link between trust, the organization of courses of action and the production of their accountability. In conclusion, we suggest undertaking empirical research to identify the practices that make trust a specific phenomenon of interactional order.
Notes
