Difference between revisions of "Garfinkel2021"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Harold Garfinkel;
 
|Author(s)=Harold Garfinkel;
 
|Title=Ethnomethodological Misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field
 
|Title=Ethnomethodological Misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field
|Editor(s)=Clemens Eisenmann; Mike Lynch
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Aron Gurwitsch; Phenomenology; Gestalt theory; Sociology of perception; Practice theory; Embodied action; Conversation analysis
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Aron Gurwitsch; Phenomenology; Gestalt theory; Sociology of perception; Practice theory; Embodied action; Conversation analysis; In press
 
 
|Key=Garfinkel2021
 
|Key=Garfinkel2021
 
|Year=2021
 
|Year=2021
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 
|Journal=Human Studies
 +
|Volume=44
 +
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=19–42
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
 
|URL=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
 
|DOI=10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
 
|DOI=10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
|Note=Sociology 271, UCLA 4/26/93
+
|Note=Sociology 271, UCLA 4/26/93.
 +
 
 +
Edited by Clemens Eisenmann and Mike Lynch.
 
|Abstract=During the 1992–1993 academic year, Harold Garfinkel (1917–2011) offered a graduate seminar on Ethnomethodology in the Sociology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles. One topic that was given extensive coverage in the seminar has not been discussed at much length in Garfinkel’s published works to date: Aron Gurwitsch’s treatment of Gestalt theory, and particularly the themes of “phenomenal field” and “praxeological description”. The edited transcript of Garfinkel’s seminar shows why he recommended that “for the serious initiatives of ethnomethodological investigations […] Gurwitsch is a theorist we can’t do without”. Garfinkel’s ethnomethodological “misreading” is not a mistaken reading, but is more a matter of taking Gurwitsch’s phenomenological demonstrations of Gestalt contextures in phenomenal fields and transposing them for making detailed, concrete observations and descriptions of organizationally achieved social phenomena. Where Gurwitsch addresses the organization of perception as an autochthonous achievement, inherent to the stream and field of individual consciousness, Garfinkel extends and elaborates this field into the social world of enacted practices. The April 1993 seminar also is rich with brief asides and digressions in which Garfinkel comments about his use of Alfred Schutz, his attitude toward publishing, his relationship with Erving Goffman, and many other matters.
 
|Abstract=During the 1992–1993 academic year, Harold Garfinkel (1917–2011) offered a graduate seminar on Ethnomethodology in the Sociology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles. One topic that was given extensive coverage in the seminar has not been discussed at much length in Garfinkel’s published works to date: Aron Gurwitsch’s treatment of Gestalt theory, and particularly the themes of “phenomenal field” and “praxeological description”. The edited transcript of Garfinkel’s seminar shows why he recommended that “for the serious initiatives of ethnomethodological investigations […] Gurwitsch is a theorist we can’t do without”. Garfinkel’s ethnomethodological “misreading” is not a mistaken reading, but is more a matter of taking Gurwitsch’s phenomenological demonstrations of Gestalt contextures in phenomenal fields and transposing them for making detailed, concrete observations and descriptions of organizationally achieved social phenomena. Where Gurwitsch addresses the organization of perception as an autochthonous achievement, inherent to the stream and field of individual consciousness, Garfinkel extends and elaborates this field into the social world of enacted practices. The April 1993 seminar also is rich with brief asides and digressions in which Garfinkel comments about his use of Alfred Schutz, his attitude toward publishing, his relationship with Erving Goffman, and many other matters.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:10, 16 June 2021

Garfinkel2021
BibType ARTICLE
Key Garfinkel2021
Author(s) Harold Garfinkel
Title Ethnomethodological Misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the Phenomenal Field
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Aron Gurwitsch, Phenomenology, Gestalt theory, Sociology of perception, Practice theory, Embodied action, Conversation analysis
Publisher
Year 2021
Language English
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 44
Number 1
Pages 19–42
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

During the 1992–1993 academic year, Harold Garfinkel (1917–2011) offered a graduate seminar on Ethnomethodology in the Sociology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles. One topic that was given extensive coverage in the seminar has not been discussed at much length in Garfinkel’s published works to date: Aron Gurwitsch’s treatment of Gestalt theory, and particularly the themes of “phenomenal field” and “praxeological description”. The edited transcript of Garfinkel’s seminar shows why he recommended that “for the serious initiatives of ethnomethodological investigations […] Gurwitsch is a theorist we can’t do without”. Garfinkel’s ethnomethodological “misreading” is not a mistaken reading, but is more a matter of taking Gurwitsch’s phenomenological demonstrations of Gestalt contextures in phenomenal fields and transposing them for making detailed, concrete observations and descriptions of organizationally achieved social phenomena. Where Gurwitsch addresses the organization of perception as an autochthonous achievement, inherent to the stream and field of individual consciousness, Garfinkel extends and elaborates this field into the social world of enacted practices. The April 1993 seminar also is rich with brief asides and digressions in which Garfinkel comments about his use of Alfred Schutz, his attitude toward publishing, his relationship with Erving Goffman, and many other matters.

Notes

Sociology 271, UCLA 4/26/93.

Edited by Clemens Eisenmann and Mike Lynch.