Difference between revisions of "Garcia2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2016-11-13 05:26:37)
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|Key=Garcia2016
+
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Key=Garcia2016
+
|Author(s)=Angela Cora Garcia;
 
|Title=Air traffic communications in routine and emergency contexts: A case study of Flight 1549 ‘miracle on the Hudson’
 
|Title=Air traffic communications in routine and emergency contexts: A case study of Flight 1549 ‘miracle on the Hudson’
|Author(s)=Angela Cora Garcia;
 
 
|Tag(s)=Airplane accidents; EMCA; grammar; turn-taking; Talk in institutional settings
 
|Tag(s)=Airplane accidents; EMCA; grammar; turn-taking; Talk in institutional settings
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|Key=Garcia2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics
 
|Volume=106
 
|Volume=106
|Number=
 
 
|Pages=57 - 71
 
|Pages=57 - 71
 
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616305689
 
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216616305689
 
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.005
 
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.005
|Note=
 
 
|Abstract=Abstract This paper is a conversation analytic investigation of Air Traffic Control (ATC) communications with U.S. Air Flight 1549 and other flights before, during, and after a critical emergency in which the plane (safely) landed in the Hudson River. While foundational conversation analytic research on air traffic communications has already been done, this method has not yet been systematically applied to air traffic communications during actual emergencies. This project will therefore fill a gap in previous research by analyzing ATC/plane interactions during an actual emergency and investigating whether routinized procedures alone are the most effective when emergency situations occur. I will show how routine interactional conventions in this work setting (e.g., the use of scripted talk and ‘positional’ grammar) help participants to maintain the safe flow of air traffic and to accommodate emergencies when they occur. I will show that during the critical emergency the \ATCO\ and the pilot of Flight 1549 switched from a routinized (scripted) form of interaction to a conversational form of interaction, and at times to a ‘hybrid’ format which combined elements of routine \ATC\ talk with elements of the speech exchange system of ordinary conversation.
 
|Abstract=Abstract This paper is a conversation analytic investigation of Air Traffic Control (ATC) communications with U.S. Air Flight 1549 and other flights before, during, and after a critical emergency in which the plane (safely) landed in the Hudson River. While foundational conversation analytic research on air traffic communications has already been done, this method has not yet been systematically applied to air traffic communications during actual emergencies. This project will therefore fill a gap in previous research by analyzing ATC/plane interactions during an actual emergency and investigating whether routinized procedures alone are the most effective when emergency situations occur. I will show how routine interactional conventions in this work setting (e.g., the use of scripted talk and ‘positional’ grammar) help participants to maintain the safe flow of air traffic and to accommodate emergencies when they occur. I will show that during the critical emergency the \ATCO\ and the pilot of Flight 1549 switched from a routinized (scripted) form of interaction to a conversational form of interaction, and at times to a ‘hybrid’ format which combined elements of routine \ATC\ talk with elements of the speech exchange system of ordinary conversation.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 11:27, 13 November 2016

Garcia2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Garcia2016
Author(s) Angela Cora Garcia
Title Air traffic communications in routine and emergency contexts: A case study of Flight 1549 ‘miracle on the Hudson’
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Airplane accidents, EMCA, grammar, turn-taking, Talk in institutional settings
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 106
Number
Pages 57 - 71
URL Link
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.005
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Abstract This paper is a conversation analytic investigation of Air Traffic Control (ATC) communications with U.S. Air Flight 1549 and other flights before, during, and after a critical emergency in which the plane (safely) landed in the Hudson River. While foundational conversation analytic research on air traffic communications has already been done, this method has not yet been systematically applied to air traffic communications during actual emergencies. This project will therefore fill a gap in previous research by analyzing ATC/plane interactions during an actual emergency and investigating whether routinized procedures alone are the most effective when emergency situations occur. I will show how routine interactional conventions in this work setting (e.g., the use of scripted talk and ‘positional’ grammar) help participants to maintain the safe flow of air traffic and to accommodate emergencies when they occur. I will show that during the critical emergency the \ATCO\ and the pilot of Flight 1549 switched from a routinized (scripted) form of interaction to a conversational form of interaction, and at times to a ‘hybrid’ format which combined elements of routine \ATC\ talk with elements of the speech exchange system of ordinary conversation.

Notes