Difference between revisions of "Gaete-etal2018"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Joaquín Gaete; Olga Smoliak; Shari Couture |Title=Reflexive Questions as Constructive Interventions: A Discursive Perspective |Editor(s...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=Joaquín Gaete; Olga Smoliak; Shari Couture
 
|Author(s)=Joaquín Gaete; Olga Smoliak; Shari Couture
 
|Title=Reflexive Questions as Constructive Interventions: A Discursive Perspective
 
|Title=Reflexive Questions as Constructive Interventions: A Discursive Perspective
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology; Researcher reflexivity; Questions
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Discursive Psychology; Researcher reflexivity; Questions
 
|Key=Gaete-etal2018
 
|Key=Gaete-etal2018
 +
|Publisher=Palgrave Macmillan
 
|Year=2018
 
|Year=2018
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 +
|Address=London
 
|Booktitle=Therapy as Discourse
 
|Booktitle=Therapy as Discourse
 
|Pages=117-140
 
|Pages=117-140

Latest revision as of 17:36, 10 October 2019

Gaete-etal2018
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Gaete-etal2018
Author(s) Joaquín Gaete, Olga Smoliak, Shari Couture
Title Reflexive Questions as Constructive Interventions: A Discursive Perspective
Editor(s) Olga Smoliak, Tom Strong
Tag(s) EMCA, Discursive Psychology, Researcher reflexivity, Questions
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Year 2018
Language English
City London
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 117-140
URL Link
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_6
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title Therapy as Discourse
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This chapter aims to promote dialogue between discursively-oriented researchers and therapists, by exploring reflexive questions as a specific discursive therapy practice that can be used to co-construct preferred understandings of clients’ relationships, identities, experiences, and actions. From a discursive psychology approach, we suggest that the constructive potential of reflexive questions rests in triggering and accomplishing preferred (acceptable and helpful) formulations of such self-understandings. In our view, this type of preferred attribution work is therapeutic in that it conversationally accomplishes client-preferred meanings and fosters clients’ autonomy and capacity to generate change on their own. In order to empirically demonstrate these therapeutic effects, we use a discursive psychological approach to analyze exemplars of reflexive questions. Based on our suggestion that understanding therapy outcomes and client’s agency can be seen as situated conversational accomplishment, we end discussing some methodological, theoretical and ethical implications for therapy research and practice.

Notes