Difference between revisions of "Frank1982"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Arthur W. Frank |Title=Improper closings: The art of conversational repudiation |Tag(s)=EMCA; Closings; |Key=Frank1982 |Year=1982 |Jour...")
 
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Arthur W. Frank
 
|Author(s)=Arthur W. Frank
 
|Title=Improper closings: The art of conversational repudiation
 
|Title=Improper closings: The art of conversational repudiation
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Closings;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Closings;
 
|Key=Frank1982
 
|Key=Frank1982
 
|Year=1982
 
|Year=1982
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
 
|Pages=357-370
 
|Pages=357-370
 +
|Abstract=Schegloff and  Sacks' paper entitled Opening  up  closings  (1974)  presents a  model
 +
of  the  transcontextual  utterance  format  (referred to  below  as  the  "structure")
 +
which speakers use  to manage the closings of  conversations.  The  authors' presentation  of  this model  is qualified as having been developed  only with  reference  to situations  in which speakers do  not  "find  it difficult  to get out  of  a  conversation they
 +
are  in"  (1974,  p.  234). In  this paper, I  examine  the Schegloff and  Sacks
 +
model  with  reference  to  the closings of  certain  "difficult"  conversations.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 05:06, 22 March 2017

Frank1982
BibType ARTICLE
Key Frank1982
Author(s) Arthur W. Frank
Title Improper closings: The art of conversational repudiation
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Closings
Publisher
Year 1982
Language
City
Month
Journal Human Studies
Volume 5
Number 4
Pages 357-370
URL
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Schegloff and Sacks' paper entitled Opening up closings (1974) presents a model of the transcontextual utterance format (referred to below as the "structure") which speakers use to manage the closings of conversations. The authors' presentation of this model is qualified as having been developed only with reference to situations in which speakers do not "find it difficult to get out of a conversation they are in" (1974, p. 234). In this paper, I examine the Schegloff and Sacks model with reference to the closings of certain "difficult" conversations.

Notes