Difference between revisions of "Due2021a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Brian Due; |Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot |Tag(s)=EMCA; In Pres...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Brian Due;
 
|Author(s)=Brian Due;
 
|Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot
 
|Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot
|Tag(s)=EMCA; In Press; F-formation; ethnomethodology; multimodal conversation analysis; telepresence robot; mobility; mediated interaction; Peircean semiotics
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; F-formation; ethnomethodology; multimodal conversation analysis; telepresence robot; mobility; mediated interaction; Peircean semiotics
|Key=Due2020a
+
|Key=Due2021a
|Year=2020
+
|Year=2021
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Semiotica
 
|Journal=Semiotica
 +
|Number=238
 +
|Pages=253–278
 
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/ahead-of-print/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148.xml
 
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/ahead-of-print/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148.xml
 
|DOI=10.1515/sem-2018-0148
 
|DOI=10.1515/sem-2018-0148
 
|Abstract=Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.
 
|Abstract=Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:30, 17 February 2021

Due2021a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Due2021a
Author(s) Brian Due
Title RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, F-formation, ethnomethodology, multimodal conversation analysis, telepresence robot, mobility, mediated interaction, Peircean semiotics
Publisher
Year 2021
Language English
City
Month
Journal Semiotica
Volume
Number 238
Pages 253–278
URL Link
DOI 10.1515/sem-2018-0148
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.

Notes