Difference between revisions of "Couture2007"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Shari J. Couture |Title=Multiparty talk in family therapy: Complexity breeds opportunity |Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Therapy; Discourse Analysi...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Shari J. Couture
 
|Author(s)=Shari J. Couture
|Title=Multiparty talk in family therapy: Complexity breeds opportunity
+
|Title=Multiparty talk in family therapy: complexity breeds opportunity
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Therapy; Discourse Analysis; Resistance;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Family Therapy; Discourse Analysis; Resistance;
 
|Key=Couture2007
 
|Key=Couture2007
 
|Year=2007
 
|Year=2007
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=26
 
|Volume=26
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=63-82
+
|Pages=63–82
 
|URL=http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
 
|URL=http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
 
|DOI=10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
 
|DOI=10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
 
|Abstract=Discursive investigations of multiparty talk can aid family therapists. In this article, discourse analysis was used to demonstrate how a therapist and family members concurrently engage multiple conversational partners to accomplish forward movement after conversational impasses. By looking closer at conversational practices, therapists can become more aware and creative as they attempt to move forward with clients. With the microlens cultivated in a discursive analysis, therapists can adopt alternative “conversational courses of action” as they become more sensitive to constructing “interventions” with clients. With this sensitivity, it is less likely that therapists will label clients resistant as they learn to become more resourceful and conversationally adaptive participants in stalled conversations. They may then better position themselves to recognize the enormous, often previously unnoticed, opportunities to join family members in multiparty talk.
 
|Abstract=Discursive investigations of multiparty talk can aid family therapists. In this article, discourse analysis was used to demonstrate how a therapist and family members concurrently engage multiple conversational partners to accomplish forward movement after conversational impasses. By looking closer at conversational practices, therapists can become more aware and creative as they attempt to move forward with clients. With the microlens cultivated in a discursive analysis, therapists can adopt alternative “conversational courses of action” as they become more sensitive to constructing “interventions” with clients. With this sensitivity, it is less likely that therapists will label clients resistant as they learn to become more resourceful and conversationally adaptive participants in stalled conversations. They may then better position themselves to recognize the enormous, often previously unnoticed, opportunities to join family members in multiparty talk.
 
 
Read More: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 09:51, 19 November 2019

Couture2007
BibType ARTICLE
Key Couture2007
Author(s) Shari J. Couture
Title Multiparty talk in family therapy: complexity breeds opportunity
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Family Therapy, Discourse Analysis, Resistance
Publisher
Year 2007
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Systemic Therapies
Volume 26
Number 1
Pages 63–82
URL Link
DOI 10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.1.63
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Discursive investigations of multiparty talk can aid family therapists. In this article, discourse analysis was used to demonstrate how a therapist and family members concurrently engage multiple conversational partners to accomplish forward movement after conversational impasses. By looking closer at conversational practices, therapists can become more aware and creative as they attempt to move forward with clients. With the microlens cultivated in a discursive analysis, therapists can adopt alternative “conversational courses of action” as they become more sensitive to constructing “interventions” with clients. With this sensitivity, it is less likely that therapists will label clients resistant as they learn to become more resourceful and conversationally adaptive participants in stalled conversations. They may then better position themselves to recognize the enormous, often previously unnoticed, opportunities to join family members in multiparty talk.

Notes