Difference between revisions of "Chung2019"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=PHDTHESIS |Author(s)=Hyunsun Chung |Title=KOREAN DISCOURSE MARKERS DEVELOPED FROM QUESTION WORDS, FOCUSING ON MWE, WAY, ETTEHKEY AND MWUSUN |Tag(s)=EMCA; K...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:52, 8 October 2019

Chung2019
BibType PHDTHESIS
Key Chung2019
Author(s) Hyunsun Chung
Title KOREAN DISCOURSE MARKERS DEVELOPED FROM QUESTION WORDS, FOCUSING ON MWE, WAY, ETTEHKEY AND MWUSUN
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Korean, Discourse markers, Grammaticalization, Interactional linguistics, Intersubjectivity
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This dissertation explores four Korean discourse markers derived from question words: mwe (what), way (why), ettehkey (how), and mwusun (which; what kind of). Most Korean question words have an additional function as indefinite words that refer to a nonspecific referent (Kim, 2000; Yang, 2005). In addition, many of these forms have discourse-pragmatic functions as discourse markers, as well (Kim, 2005; Koo, 2004; Suh, 2007). Corpus analysis shows that mwe, way, ettehkey, and mwusun are highly frequent wh-words that are also frequently employed as discourse markers, which carry out various pragmatic functions and have no syntactic role, in naturally occurring spoken conversation in Korean. Research has also shown that discourse markers develop from Korean question words as the outcome of grammaticalization processes (Rhee, 2016). This study takes a diachronic approach to demonstrate that mwe, way, ettehkey, and mwusun have gradually developed through grammaticalization processes into discourse markers that express the speaker’s modality or index the speaker’s intersubjective consideration of the addressee(s). The study also takes a synchronic approach to understand these four discourse markers’ functions in contemporary Korean. It applies conversation analysis to spoken data from two sources: the Korean Telephone Conversations Speech Corpus and several recently produced Korean television dramas. The results shed light on the general characteristics and developmental paths of Korean discourse markers that originated as question words and indefinite words from the perspective of grammaticalization and pragmaticalization.

Notes