Difference between revisions of "Bucholtz2007a"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Mary Bucholtz |Title=Reply: Variability in transcribers |Tag(s)=EMCA; Transcription; Context; Genre; Practice; Research relationship; Te...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Mary Bucholtz | |Author(s)=Mary Bucholtz | ||
|Title=Reply: Variability in transcribers | |Title=Reply: Variability in transcribers | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Transcription; Context; Genre; Practice; Research relationship; Technology; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Transcription; Context; Genre; Practice; Research relationship; Technology; |
|Key=Bucholtz2007a | |Key=Bucholtz2007a | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=6 |
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=837–842 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445607082585 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445607082585 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445607082585 | ||
|Abstract=Variation in transcription is due in large part to variability in transcribers' theoretical and methodological commitments and goals. This reply addresses issues raised in the commentaries on the article `Variation in Transcription' concerning problems of representing different discourse genres in transcripts, the question of how research relationships shape the transcription process, the intellectual and institutional contexts in which transcription occurs and circulates, and the injunction to consider the practices as opposed to the products of transcription. | |Abstract=Variation in transcription is due in large part to variability in transcribers' theoretical and methodological commitments and goals. This reply addresses issues raised in the commentaries on the article `Variation in Transcription' concerning problems of representing different discourse genres in transcripts, the question of how research relationships shape the transcription process, the intellectual and institutional contexts in which transcription occurs and circulates, and the injunction to consider the practices as opposed to the products of transcription. | ||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:04, 19 November 2019
| Bucholtz2007a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bucholtz2007a |
| Author(s) | Mary Bucholtz |
| Title | Reply: Variability in transcribers |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Transcription, Context, Genre, Practice, Research relationship, Technology |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 837–842 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445607082585 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Variation in transcription is due in large part to variability in transcribers' theoretical and methodological commitments and goals. This reply addresses issues raised in the commentaries on the article `Variation in Transcription' concerning problems of representing different discourse genres in transcripts, the question of how research relationships shape the transcription process, the intellectual and institutional contexts in which transcription occurs and circulates, and the injunction to consider the practices as opposed to the products of transcription.
Notes
