Difference between revisions of "Benwell-Rhys2018"
m |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Journal=Social Science & Medicine | |Journal=Social Science & Medicine | ||
|Volume=200 | |Volume=200 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=218–226 |
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618300340 | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618300340 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.034 |
|Abstract=Preoperative assessments provide an essential clinical risk assessment aimed at identifying patient risks and requirements prior to surgery. As such they require effective and sensitive information-gathering skills. In addition to physical examination, the preoperative assessment includes a series of routine questions assessing a patient's fitness for surgery. These questions are typically designed to elicit minimal, ‘no problem’ responses, but patients sometimes produce expanded responses that extend beyond the projected information. Our analysis reveals that troubles-telling is often invoked by both nurses and patients as an effective, patient-centred resource for negotiating the medical relevance of patients' concerns in these contexts. | |Abstract=Preoperative assessments provide an essential clinical risk assessment aimed at identifying patient risks and requirements prior to surgery. As such they require effective and sensitive information-gathering skills. In addition to physical examination, the preoperative assessment includes a series of routine questions assessing a patient's fitness for surgery. These questions are typically designed to elicit minimal, ‘no problem’ responses, but patients sometimes produce expanded responses that extend beyond the projected information. Our analysis reveals that troubles-telling is often invoked by both nurses and patients as an effective, patient-centred resource for negotiating the medical relevance of patients' concerns in these contexts. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:45, 14 January 2020
| Benwell-Rhys2018 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Benwell-Rhys2018 |
| Author(s) | Bethan Benwell, Catrin S. Rhys |
| Title | Negotiating relevance in pre-operative assessments |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, UK, Troubles, Nurse, Nurse-patient interaction, Medical, Applied, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2018 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Volume | 200 |
| Number | |
| Pages | 218–226 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.034 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Preoperative assessments provide an essential clinical risk assessment aimed at identifying patient risks and requirements prior to surgery. As such they require effective and sensitive information-gathering skills. In addition to physical examination, the preoperative assessment includes a series of routine questions assessing a patient's fitness for surgery. These questions are typically designed to elicit minimal, ‘no problem’ responses, but patients sometimes produce expanded responses that extend beyond the projected information. Our analysis reveals that troubles-telling is often invoked by both nurses and patients as an effective, patient-centred resource for negotiating the medical relevance of patients' concerns in these contexts.
Notes
