Difference between revisions of "Austin2007"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | |BibType= | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
|Author(s)=Helena Austin; Richard Fitzgerald | |Author(s)=Helena Austin; Richard Fitzgerald | ||
| − | |Title=Resisting categorisation: | + | |Title=Resisting categorisation: an ordinary mother |
| − | + | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization; | |
| − | |Tag(s)=Membership Categorization; | ||
|Key=Austin2007 | |Key=Austin2007 | ||
|Year=2007 | |Year=2007 | ||
|Journal=Australian Review of Applied Linguistics | |Journal=Australian Review of Applied Linguistics | ||
| − | |||
|Volume=30 | |Volume=30 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |Pages=36.1–36.13 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/aral.30.3.07aus |
| + | |DOI=10.2104/aral0736 | ||
| + | |Abstract=In this paper we use membership category analysis to examine the way an interviewee utilises category work in order to resist the possible accusation of being a bad mother and instead posit her mothering as ordinary. Through our analysis we explore the interactional work of ascribing and resisting categorisation organised through claims and counter-claims making procedures routinely grounded in descriptions and accounts, and embedded in shifts between individual and categorial actions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:21, 19 November 2019
| Austin2007 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Austin2007 |
| Author(s) | Helena Austin, Richard Fitzgerald |
| Title | Resisting categorisation: an ordinary mother |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Membership Categorization |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2007 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Australian Review of Applied Linguistics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 36.1–36.13 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.2104/aral0736 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper we use membership category analysis to examine the way an interviewee utilises category work in order to resist the possible accusation of being a bad mother and instead posit her mothering as ordinary. Through our analysis we explore the interactional work of ascribing and resisting categorisation organised through claims and counter-claims making procedures routinely grounded in descriptions and accounts, and embedded in shifts between individual and categorial actions.
Notes
