Atkins2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 03:25, 21 February 2019 by BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2019-02-21 09:25:09)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Atkins2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Atkins2019
Author(s) Sarah Atkins
Title Assessing health professionals’ communication through role-play: An interactional analysis of simulated versus actual general practice consultations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Applied Linguistics, Assessment, Communication Skills, Corpus Linguistics, General Practice, Health Communication, Primary Care Consultations, Simulated Interaction, Simulation, Standardization, Medical EMCA
Publisher
Year 2019
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 21
Number 2
Pages 109-134
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445618802659
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Simulations, in which healthcare professionals are observed in dialogue with role-played patients, are widely used for assessing professional skills. Medical education research suggests simulations should be as authentic as possible, but there remains a lack of linguistic research into how far such settings authentically reproduce talk. This article presents an analysis of a corpus of general practice simulations in the United Kingdom, comparing this to a dataset of real-life general practitioner (GP) consultations. Combining corpus linguistic and conversation analytic methodologies, key interactional features of the simulations are identified, particularly those associated with successful/unsuccessful performance in terms of the examiner’s grading. The corpus analysis identifies various forms of the phrase ‘tell me more about’ to occur significantly more frequently in the simulations compared to real GP consultations, typically in the opening sequences and most frequently in successful cases. It falls to a conversation analysis of the data, examining this phrase within the interactional context of these opening sequences, to better understand the actions it performs. Successful candidates in the simulations are found to perform a consistent sequential pattern, often incorporating this phrase. Although simulated, these interactions have real professional consequences for those being assessed. Linguistic findings about what constitutes successful interaction or differences to real-life practice therefore have important implications for professional education and assessment.

Notes