Andersen2019

From emcawiki
Revision as of 03:23, 17 October 2019 by AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elisabeth Muth Andersen; Gitte Rasmussen; Catherine E. Brouwer; Jytte Isaksen |Title=Getting to 'no': three ways to jointly accomplish a...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Andersen2019
BibType ARTICLE
Key Andersen2019
Author(s) Elisabeth Muth Andersen, Gitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer, Jytte Isaksen
Title Getting to 'no': three ways to jointly accomplish an answer to questions in a questionnaire in doctor–patient interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, doctor-patient interaction
Publisher
Year 2019
Language English
City
Month
Journal Communication & Medicine
Volume 15
Number 1
Pages 1–13
URL Link
DOI 10.1558/cam.32459
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

his paper aims to describe the interactional processes through which a medical professional and a patient collaboratively accomplish filling out answers to a questionnaire. Empirical analysis of three different sequences from a video-recorded doctor-patient interaction in which questions of a questionnaire were answered with a ‘no' reveals three different ways (or methods) in which doctor and patient accomplish this jointly. Applying ethnomethodological conversation analysis (EMCA) as our methodological framework, we conclude that the three interactional practices are fitted in relation to the constraints of the interview that is itself methodically aligned to the practices and organizational structures of the institution, a Danish hospital. Furthermore, we make the case that questionnaires are designed as idealizations of question-answer sequences, and as such do not operate at the same level of detail as the actual question-answer situation. Details that are crucial for the objective of the questionnaire (in this case providing information to a third party) may not be included in the recorded answer. Thus, we argue that in order to understand the informational value of recorded answers in questionnaires, we need to diagnose the interaction in which they were produced, i.e. to critically examine it.

Notes