Difference between revisions of "Alexander2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2020-03-20 11:02:40)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=ARTICLE
 +
|Author(s)=Marc Alexander; Elizabeth Stokoe;
 +
|Title=Characterological Formulations of Persons in Neighbourhood Complaint Sequences
 +
|Tag(s)=Characterological formulations; complaints; conversation analysis; discursive psychology; environmental health; institutions; mediation; neighbourhood disputes; service provision; EMCA
 
|Key=Alexander2020
 
|Key=Alexander2020
|Key=Alexander2020
 
|Title=Characterological Formulations of Persons in Neighbourhood Complaint Sequences
 
|Author(s)=Marc Alexander; Elizabeth Stokoe;
 
|Tag(s)=Characterological formulations; complaints; conversation analysis; discursive psychology; environmental health; institutions; mediation; neighbourhood disputes; service provision; EMCA; In Press
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Publisher=Routledge
 
 
|Year=2020
 
|Year=2020
|Month=feb
+
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Qualitative Research in Psychology
 
|Journal=Qualitative Research in Psychology
|Volume=0
+
|Volume=17
|Number=0
+
|Number=3
|Pages=1–17
+
|Pages=413–429
 +
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14780887.2020.1725950
 
|DOI=10.1080/14780887.2020.1725950
 
|DOI=10.1080/14780887.2020.1725950
|Note=
 
 
|Abstract=This article shows how speakers mobilise characterological formulations of people and, particularly, `types' of persons, in social action. We extend previous work in discursive psychology, in which notions of self or others' identity have been well-studied as categorial practices, by focusing specifically on the occasioned use of `[descriptor] person' formulations which index the characteristics of people. Drawing on a British corpus of 315 telephone calls about neighbour problems (e.g., noise, verbal abuse) to environmental health and mediation services, we show that callers build in-situ descriptions of self and neighbour for the practical activity of complaining or defending against accusations \textendash as types of people that are, for instance, reasonable (e.g., `I'm an extremely tolerant person'), in contrast to their neighbours' shortcomings (e.g., `he's a rather obnoxious person'). Our findings demonstrate that psychological predicates of self and other, indexed through characterological formulations, are recipient designed (i.e., formulated to display an orientation to co-present others) in ways that shape the institutional relevance for service provision. We conclude that, like many other aspects of the psychological thesaurus, `character types' are not just the preserve of psychologists but also a routine resource for ordinary social interaction.
 
|Abstract=This article shows how speakers mobilise characterological formulations of people and, particularly, `types' of persons, in social action. We extend previous work in discursive psychology, in which notions of self or others' identity have been well-studied as categorial practices, by focusing specifically on the occasioned use of `[descriptor] person' formulations which index the characteristics of people. Drawing on a British corpus of 315 telephone calls about neighbour problems (e.g., noise, verbal abuse) to environmental health and mediation services, we show that callers build in-situ descriptions of self and neighbour for the practical activity of complaining or defending against accusations \textendash as types of people that are, for instance, reasonable (e.g., `I'm an extremely tolerant person'), in contrast to their neighbours' shortcomings (e.g., `he's a rather obnoxious person'). Our findings demonstrate that psychological predicates of self and other, indexed through characterological formulations, are recipient designed (i.e., formulated to display an orientation to co-present others) in ways that shape the institutional relevance for service provision. We conclude that, like many other aspects of the psychological thesaurus, `character types' are not just the preserve of psychologists but also a routine resource for ordinary social interaction.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:39, 23 April 2020

Alexander2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Alexander2020
Author(s) Marc Alexander, Elizabeth Stokoe
Title Characterological Formulations of Persons in Neighbourhood Complaint Sequences
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Characterological formulations, complaints, conversation analysis, discursive psychology, environmental health, institutions, mediation, neighbourhood disputes, service provision, EMCA
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Qualitative Research in Psychology
Volume 17
Number 3
Pages 413–429
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1725950
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article shows how speakers mobilise characterological formulations of people and, particularly, `types' of persons, in social action. We extend previous work in discursive psychology, in which notions of self or others' identity have been well-studied as categorial practices, by focusing specifically on the occasioned use of `[descriptor] person' formulations which index the characteristics of people. Drawing on a British corpus of 315 telephone calls about neighbour problems (e.g., noise, verbal abuse) to environmental health and mediation services, we show that callers build in-situ descriptions of self and neighbour for the practical activity of complaining or defending against accusations \textendash as types of people that are, for instance, reasonable (e.g., `I'm an extremely tolerant person'), in contrast to their neighbours' shortcomings (e.g., `he's a rather obnoxious person'). Our findings demonstrate that psychological predicates of self and other, indexed through characterological formulations, are recipient designed (i.e., formulated to display an orientation to co-present others) in ways that shape the institutional relevance for service provision. We conclude that, like many other aspects of the psychological thesaurus, `character types' are not just the preserve of psychologists but also a routine resource for ordinary social interaction.

Notes