Difference between revisions of "Alexander-etal2019"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Marc Alexander; Daniel Blackburn; Markus Reuber; |Title=Patients’ accounts of memory lapses in interactions between neurologists and p...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
|Pages=249–265 | |Pages=249–265 | ||
| + | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9566.12819 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12819 | |DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.12819 | ||
| − | |Abstract=One of the most commonly made diagnoses in secondary care memory services | + | |Abstract=One of the most commonly made diagnoses in secondary care memory services is functional memory disorder (FMD). FMD is non‐progressive and characterised by persistent worries about memory failures without objective evidence of cognitive impairment. This study explores how patients with FMD present their memory concerns. Utilizing video recordings of consultations between patients and neurologists in a memory clinic, we show that FMD patients account for their memory deficits as significant disruptions to their daily lives. Resonating with research which identified a dissonance between self‐reports of memory functioning by FMD patients and the outcome of neuropsychological assessments, we demonstrate that, in giving a detailed account of their perceived memory problems, patients provide objective conversational evidence of their cognitive and memory capacity, implicitly undermining the claim of an objective problem. Using conversation analysis, we examine three of the more prominent interactional practices FMD patients draw on when attempting to communicate memory deficits to the doctor – they are (i) contrasts with a standard of ‘normal’; (ii) third‐party observations; and (iii) direct reported speech. These interactional features are recurrent devices for displaying memory concerns as legitimate problems, embedded within patients’ accounts of their day‐to‐day lives. |
| − | is functional memory disorder (FMD). FMD is | ||
| − | characterised by persistent worries about memory failures without objective | ||
| − | evidence of cognitive impairment. This study explores how patients with FMD | ||
| − | present their memory concerns. Utilizing video recordings of consultations | ||
| − | between patients and neurologists in a memory clinic, we show that FMD | ||
| − | patients account for their memory | ||
| − | daily lives. Resonating with research which | ||
| − | |||
| − | neuropsychological assessments, we demonstrate that, in giving a detailed | ||
| − | account of their perceived memory problems, patients provide objective | ||
| − | conversational evidence of their cognitive and memory capacity, implicitly | ||
| − | undermining the claim of an objective problem. Using conversation analysis, we | ||
| − | examine three of the more prominent interactional practices FMD patients draw | ||
| − | on when attempting to communicate memory | ||
| − | (i) contrasts with a standard of ‘normal’; (ii) | ||
| − | direct reported speech. These interactional features are recurrent devices for | ||
| − | displaying memory concerns as legitimate problems, embedded within patients’ | ||
| − | accounts of their | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 19 January 2020
| Alexander-etal2019 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Alexander-etal2019 |
| Author(s) | Marc Alexander, Daniel Blackburn, Markus Reuber |
| Title | Patients’ accounts of memory lapses in interactions between neurologists and patients with functional memory disorders |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Conversation analysis, Dementia, Mental health and illness |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2019 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology of Health & Illness |
| Volume | 41 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 249–265 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.12819 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
One of the most commonly made diagnoses in secondary care memory services is functional memory disorder (FMD). FMD is non‐progressive and characterised by persistent worries about memory failures without objective evidence of cognitive impairment. This study explores how patients with FMD present their memory concerns. Utilizing video recordings of consultations between patients and neurologists in a memory clinic, we show that FMD patients account for their memory deficits as significant disruptions to their daily lives. Resonating with research which identified a dissonance between self‐reports of memory functioning by FMD patients and the outcome of neuropsychological assessments, we demonstrate that, in giving a detailed account of their perceived memory problems, patients provide objective conversational evidence of their cognitive and memory capacity, implicitly undermining the claim of an objective problem. Using conversation analysis, we examine three of the more prominent interactional practices FMD patients draw on when attempting to communicate memory deficits to the doctor – they are (i) contrasts with a standard of ‘normal’; (ii) third‐party observations; and (iii) direct reported speech. These interactional features are recurrent devices for displaying memory concerns as legitimate problems, embedded within patients’ accounts of their day‐to‐day lives.
Notes
