Vehvilainen2009

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Vehvilainen2009
BibType ARTICLE
Key Vehvilainen2009
Author(s) Sanna Vehviläinen
Title Student-initiated advice in academic supervision
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Student initiations, Advice giving
Publisher
Year 2009
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 42
Number 2
Pages 163–190
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351810902864560
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The article analyzes student-initiated advice sequences in Finnish master’s thesis supervision, encounters where teachers and students discuss students’ ongoing thesis work. Drawing from prior conversation analytic research on advice giving, advice is analyzed here as a problem-solving activity. The article presents two questioning formats used by students. Format I, less frequent, invokes a clear lack of knowledge or competence in a relevant thesis task. Through open-ended question elements and various other design features, these questions constitute a clear plea for help. They also tend to be successful in eliciting extensive advice and help from teachers. Format II, clearly more frequently used in the data, presents checks and proposals and thereby suggests potential solutions to potential problems in the thesis. Polar question or statement formats are used. These questions receive advice in the form of expansions: In addition to the minimal confirmation or disconfirmation, the teachers provide grounds and accounts for their responses. The article demonstrates that responding to student questions is a central pedagogical activity in supervision. In addition, the study shows that in their responding activities, teachers not only orient to the problem-solving task (remedy) but also to estimating the usefulness of the student’s problem (relevance). The article discusses these results in terms of their pedagogical relevance and their contribution to the research on advice giving, especially in connection to institutional settings where advisees’ autonomy and self-directedness need to be balanced with advice givers’ expert perspectives.

Notes