Emirbayer2011

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Emirbayer2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Emirbayer2011
Author(s) Mustafa Emirbayer, Douglas W. Maynard
Title Pragmatism and ethnomethodology
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Conversation Analysis, Ethnomethodology, Pragmatics, Basic Resources
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Qualitative Sociology
Volume 34
Number 1
Pages 221–261
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s11133-010-9183-8
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Three features of pragmatist thought remain empirically underdeveloped or insufficiently explored: its call for a return to experience or recovery of concrete practices; its idea that obstacles in experience give rise to efforts at creative problem-solving; and its understanding of language in use, including conversational interaction, as an order of empirical practices in and through which problem-solving efforts are undertaken and social order ongoingly and collaboratively accomplished. Our aim in this article is to show that there exists a long-standing, theoretically informed, and empirically rich research tradition in which these pragmatist themes are further developed, albeit in ways the originators might have foreseen only in dimly programmatic form. This research tradition is ethnomethodology. We present in bold strokes the classical pragmatist ideas of Peirce, James, Mead, Dewey, plus Addams, focusing on the three themes mentioned above. We show how Garfinkel’s work surpasses even that of the pragmatists in developing the larger implications and promise of those themes. We demonstrate how ethnomethodological studies of work and science and conversation analysis, respectively, continue as well to develop the original pragmatist impulse in unsuspected ways. Finally, we step back from this account to ponder the broader significance of the connections we have explored between pragmatism and ethnomethodology.

Notes